Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

[Michael G Schwern]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:23:43PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Pulling out or mangling time strikes me as intensely pointless, and I don't 
> see it happening. The socket stuff is really the only core functionality 
> that makes any sense to pull out, and that only from an architectural 
> standpoint.

Perhaps some of the more grossly UNIX specific things like getpwnam's
extended family and the SysV IPC stuff?

-- 

Michael G. Schwern   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
MERV GRIFFIN!