At 01:41 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: >On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:24:38PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > Here's a gross thought (for implementors at least ;) > > > > If it sees > > > > use CGI qw( param header ); > > > > the autoloader could look for a module which implements the 'CGI' > > interface and has those two functions. > >Problem is, its extremely difficult to figure out what module >implements what. Right, which is one of the reasons why this is going to be explicit. No magic here--there's too much potential for things to get badly messed up. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Ken Fox
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Ted Ashton
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Johan Vromans
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Tim Bunce
- RE: Really auto autoloaded modules Garrett Goebel
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dave Rolsky