At 01:41 PM 2/1/2001 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:24:38PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > Here's a gross thought (for implementors at least ;)
> >
> > If it sees
> >
> > use CGI qw( param header );
> >
> > the autoloader could look for a module which implements the 'CGI'
> > interface and has those two functions.
>
>Problem is, its extremely difficult to figure out what module
>implements what.
Right, which is one of the reasons why this is going to be explicit. No
magic here--there's too much potential for things to get badly messed up.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Ken Fox
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Ted Ashton
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Johan Vromans
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Tim Bunce
- RE: Really auto autoloaded modules Garrett Goebel
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dave Rolsky
