On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:04:41PM -0500, Ken Fox wrote: > Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Looks pretty close to what's needed. Care to flesh it out (and streamline > > it where needed) to a PDD? > > Isn't the trick to detect the necessary modules at compile time? Yeah, but at least with AnyLoader as a prototype we can flesh out the semantics and details of how it should work and what should be registered and how the registry works, etc... > Maybe the EXPORT list should be registered without module > names and the EXPORT_OK list with module names? Maybe I can do something with UNIVERSAL::exports. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Summer sun beats down I sigh and wait for winter warm paste enemas. -- mjd
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dave Rolsky
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Ken Fox
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Ted Ashton
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Johan Vromans
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Tim Bunce
- RE: Really auto autoloaded modules Garrett Goebel
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Michael G Schwern