Re: Really auto autoloaded modules

[Dan Sugalski]

At 01:00 PM 2/2/2001 -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > Problem is, its extremely difficult to figure out what module
> > implements what.  Sure, if you see a C<sub foo {...}> you have a
>
>I wasn't clear.  I was thinking that somehow a module would register with
>the core what interfaces it support when it is installed.  Anything else
>is madness (ok, my idea is madness too).

Your idea's not madness--it is, in fact, what I'm looking for us to define.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk