Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > I rather like the idea that contract names are themselves namespace
> 
> I rather dislike it: I think we are trying to stuff to much information
> on the package namespaces.

Well, I didn't say *package* namespace; I'm just pointing out that
contract names can probably use the same kind of hierarchical
categorization that other names do.


> And for the the next J. D. P. person that comes along we say "tough
> luck"?  No thanks, that's exactly the same mess we are now with the
> package names.

When you come up with a solution to this problem, please send an
email to ICANN.

-- 
John Porter

You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.

Reply via email to