Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[Edward Peschko]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:25:44PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> > well, I was thinking about this - there really should be an extra switch that
> > makes this possible, rather than typing 'no strict; no warn;' ie:
> > 
> > #!/usr/local/bin/perl -q # for quick and dirty.
> 
> We already have a switch that means "quick and dirty", it's called
> "-e"

Beautiful. then just co-opt it. Right now when I say:

#!/usr/local/bin/perl -e

in a file i get

Can't emulate -e on #! line at a.p.

Either that, or add '-q' as a file version for '-e'. 

And in any case, make '-e' have the additional connotation that implies 
'no strict', and 'no warn'.  Seems simple enough to me.

Ed