Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[Edward Peschko]

> >And in any case, make '-e' have the additional connotation that implies
> >'no strict', and 'no warn'.
> 
> no 'warnings'

thanks. 'no warnings'

> >  Seems simple enough to me.

> Yes, that's what I thought; but this has generated more heat than light, at 
> least on the times I've brought it up, e.g.,
> 
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00025.html

Well, I agree with pretty much everything you said, except I like '-q' better
than '-z' for aesthetic reasons.

So... what was the rationale against it?

Ed