At 07:01 PM 3/26/2001 -0500, John Porter wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > If we disallow changing the attributes on subs at runtime,
>
>Probably a good idea anyway, at least for a subset of attributes,
>such as :idempotent (or :constant).
Oh, it's a fine idea, and I'm personally all for it. Anything that reduces
the uncertainty the optimizer sees is fine with me. :) It is, however,
Larry's call, though I can certainly rattle off the things I'd like to see
as options.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Simon Cozens
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Trond Michelsen
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Tad McClellan
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Russ Allbery
- Re: Schwartzian Transform Russ Allbery
