Michael G Schwern wrote: > ETOOMAGICAL. Shades of zip/unzip here. On some systems zip and unzip > are just hard links to the same binary. It figures out what it > supposed to do by what name is called. Very magical. Very bad. Well, the proposed trick for perl would be bad; what zip does isn't. argv[0] is just another arg, afterall. > Hmm... programs that have perl one-liners inside them might be > troublesome. It shouldn't be. For some reason, I suspect that VERY few sysadmins are going to install perl6 as /usr/bin/perl on any machine where that used to be perl5. Can we make a point right now of NOT having perl6's configure do that? -- John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Glenn Linderman
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ted Ashton
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Garrett Goebel
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Edward Peschko
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley