> ok, well.. I've heard arguments for '+' (namely that its intuitive, other > language compatible, etc...) so what are the arguments against it? Well, it looks like I'm a little bit behind. Spend 15 minutes typing something, and you get 7 messages in your mailbox on the exact topic that you had questions on. sheesh. Ed
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Graham Barr
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Russ Allbery
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John L. Allen
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John L. Allen
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Peter Scott
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur