On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:23:33PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > ok, well.. I've heard arguments for '+' (namely that its intuitive, other > language compatible, etc...) so what are the arguments against it? This one seems to have slipped by... http://archive.develooper.com/perl6-language%40perl.org/msg06550.html Basically talking about the problems of trying to use the same operator for strings and concat in a typeless language. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One Beer still cheaper than crack!
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Russ Allbery
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John L. Allen
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John L. Allen
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Edward Peschko
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Peter Scott
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloadi... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur