On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 04:38:24PM -0500, Me wrote: > Question 1: > > Afaict, even with use strict at its most strict, perl 6 > can't (in practice) complain, at compile time, if > > $foo.Foun > > refers to an undeclared Foun. > > Right? Can't you hear the low roar from the strong-typing argument coming from the thread next door? -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One Stupid am I? Stupid like a fox!
- $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Me
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Michael G Schwern
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Damian Conway
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Me
- "closed" property ((was Re: $foo.Foun... David L. Nicol
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Damian Conway
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Me
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Damian Conway
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Me
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) David L. Nicol
- Re: $foo.Foun (was Re: Properties and stricture) Me