> Bart Lateur: > # On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:22:55 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > # > # >Binary // > # > > # >The analogy to || is probably a bit too clever. My first reaction > # >was it's some sort of weird division operator. But it's > servicable. > # > # I think it's very cute. I think of it as a "skewed or", > which is, er, > # both what it both is, and what it looks like. > > If we have 'and', 'or' and 'xor', can we have 'dor' (defined > or) to be a low-precedence version of this?
Should this be pronounced "duh" ? :-) R.
