Michael Lazzaro wrote: [...some good points...] > and has resulted in us revisiting decisions *repeatedly*
Simon Cozens wrote: [...some good ideas...] > [1] You can tell I've been rereading MMM... Maybe there's some benefit to be had from revisiting old material? :-) I can't think of any non-trivial piece of software I've written without going over the design several times... ....just like I can't think of any great book that I've fully appreciated without reading through it several times. Sometimes the Perl 6 design process looks like a machine that's running fast but moving forward slowly, churning over the same ground. But in this case, the purpose of our vehicle is to plough the ground. We're more concerned about tilling the soil than getting to the other side of the field as quickly as possible. From that perspective, it looks to me at least, like we're making much better progress. Well, "we" meaning "you". I'm no use to anyone - my head exploded days ago in a big mess of Unicode operators. <<*[BOOM]*>>8-| Keep up the good work. A
