In a somewhat related topic:

    pugs> (1,(2,3),4)[2]
    4

Because the invocant to .[] assumes a Singular context.
I'm not sure how any invocant can assume a Plural context anyway,
so this behaviour seems correct.  Is it, though? :)

Thanks,
/Autrijus/

Attachment: pgpihJttxQxy9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to