On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:00:15PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote: > On 5/11/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a somewhat related topic: > > > > pugs> (1,(2,3),4) > > 4 > > > > Because the invocant to . assumes a Singular context. > > Right, but the *inside* of the invocant is still a list, so it's in > list context. I think that line should return 3.
You're totally right, and I was clearly wahnsinnig. It now returns 3. Thanks, /Autrijus/
Description: PGP signature