Larry Wall schrieb: > I think the ¥ and Y operators are going to have to change to something else.
Very probably I missed something as I'm only a distant observer of the Perl6 development: Why not just call it "zip"?! There is a function called zip, wouldn't it be possible to create an operator with the same name? zip(@a; @b) -> function @a zip @b -> operator Or would that lead to grammar ambiguities, that are impossible to resolve? -- Thomas Wittek http://gedankenkonstrukt.de/ Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
