.cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever).
Besides, I hope that the language and wiki will be successful enough that a cgi-based implementation will completely fail to scale to meet demand. :) On 12/29/07, Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who didn't know (or didn't recognize the links), these are the > URLs for the official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis: > > http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi > > http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi > > Contributions of content are of course always welcome. > > Please consider linking to these wikis where appropriate, to help raise > their visibility and utility. > > (Also consider dropping a note to perl6-users about major wiki updates of > general interest to Perl 6 test drivers and fans.) > > FYI, there's also an official Perl 5 wiki. > > http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi > > Best regards, > Conrad Schneiker > > www.AthenaLab.com > > > > -- Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
