On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Carl Mäsak wrote:

Meanwhile, the uncanny similarities between Perl 6 and Algol 68
continue to strike me:

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALGOL_68> (]):
] ALGOL 68 [...] was conceived as a successor to the ALGOL 60 programming
] language, designed with the goal of a much wider scope of application and more
] rigorously defined syntax and semantics.

Algol 68 is notorious as a failure. Let's hope things are different here.

        :)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Name: Tim Nelson                 | Because the Creator is,        |
| E-mail: wayl...@wayland.id.au    | I am                           |
---------------------------------------------------------------------

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version 3.12
GCS d+++ s+: a- C++$ U+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+ N+ w--- V- PE(+) Y+>++ PGP->+++ R(+) !tv b++ DI++++ D G+ e++>++++ h! y-
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

Reply via email to