-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/10 13:00 , Dave Whipp wrote: > Damian Conway wrote: >> I've been thinking about junctions, and I believe we may need a small >> tweak to (at least) the jargon in one part of the specification. > > When this issue has been raised in the past, the response has been that > junctions are not really intended to be useful outside of the narrow purpose > for which they were introduced.
It occurs to me: If their purpose is that narrow, why are they wasting conceptual space in the core language? - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzC5gsACgkQIn7hlCsL25Wp8ACbBzcg2kACC/hmtTD1GUGe2lD2 2ucAmgNSPb5F6T3SqqHMvvG7UzFR9M3D =1x5F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
