> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:29:33PM -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
> > 
> > > Any requirements on how solid an implementation section should be
> > > should be left to the working group chairs.
> > 
> > Sorry, I don't understand this.  What is the WGC's role here?
> My english native language is?  :-)

I didn't have problem with the parsing.  I had trouble with the meaning.

Suppose a WGC establishes a requirement for the solidity of the
implementation section, and receives an RFC that does not meet the
requirements.  What then?

Reply via email to