> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:29:33PM -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > > > > Any requirements on how solid an implementation section should be > > > should be left to the working group chairs. > > > > Sorry, I don't understand this. What is the WGC's role here? > > My english native language is? :-) I didn't have problem with the parsing. I had trouble with the meaning. Suppose a WGC establishes a requirement for the solidity of the implementation section, and receives an RFC that does not meet the requirements. What then?
- Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections John Porter
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Tom Hughes
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Nathan Wiger
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sectio... Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION s... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATI... Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections David L. Nicol