On Monday, October 09, 2000 9:39 PM, J. David Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Let me make the following proposal: let's test your idea on itself. > Require n nominations/seconds/whatever to bring your idea to a vote (n > should be determined by you and Nat Torkington). If it does come to a > vote, conduct it in 30 days, along the lines you have said, and if it > passes with a simple majority, give it to Larry as a proposal and see > if he wants to veto it. I'll go on the record as saying I would vote > against the proposal, but wouldn't be upset if it passed. Uh, Nat asked for ideas. I gave one. Feel free to give a better one.
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- Re: Continued RFC process John Porter
- Re: Continued RFC process Bart Lateur
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Stephen Zander
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Tad McClellan
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process John Porter
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Peter Buckingham
- Re: Continued RFC process Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Continued RFC process Russ Allbery
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski