On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparison-of-perl-5-and-rakudo-star.html

Thanks for posting this.

Can I infer from this article that it is *rakudo*, which is slow, rather
than parrot?  I have the impression that I can compile perl6 down to
parrot code and run that separately.  If so, it will be interesting to
benchmark both cases.


Reply via email to