You really do want to be exclusionary, don't you?
yada yada stackoverflow is the one truth yada yada.
Enough.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:12 AM JJ Merelo <jjmer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (also: ask questions in StackOverflow whenever possible :-) )
>
> El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 9:09, JJ Merelo (<jjmer...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> Use binding:
>>
>> my @x= <1 2 3>; my @y := @x but Iterable; say @y.^name; # OUTPUT:
>> «Array+{Iterable}»
>>
>> El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 9:06, Joseph Brenner (<doom...@gmail.com>)
>> escribió:
>>
>>> I thought this would work to make a copy of @x but with the role
>>> "LookInside" attached to it:
>>>
>>> my @y = @x but LookInside;
>>>
>>> But that didn't add the role to @y. E.g.
>>>
>>> say @y.^WHAT
>>>
>>> Would just report (Array), not (Array+{LookInside}).
>>>
>>> I found that this would do what I was trying to do though:
>>>
>>> my @y = @x;
>>> @y does LookInside;
>>>
>>> I didn't think there would be any difference between the two
>>> though. What am I not getting?
>>>
>>> The full code looks like this:
>>>
>>> trial_introspect.pl6:
>>>
>>> use v6;
>>> use Trial::Introspect;
>>> my @x = <wuhn tew thuree foah fahv sex>;
>>> my @y = @x;
>>> @y does LookInside;
>>> say "Methods: ";
>>> say @y.methodical_methods;
>>>
>>>
>>> .../Trial/Introspect.pm6:
>>>
>>> role LookInside {
>>> method methodical_methods {
>>> self.^methods.map({ .gist }).sort.unique.map({ "$_\n" }).grep({
>>> ! /^Method/ });
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> JJ
>>
>
>
> --
> JJ
>
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
