On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:46 AM Simon Proctor <simon.proc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What if something could return an Int or a Rat? Or an single item or an > Array? Having Mu or Any as the listed return type isn't very useful. > > Maybe better to define a subset for it. Or just leave it empty and > document it. > For an Int or a Rat, you could just document with --> Numeric. It isn't as constrained as a subset Int|Rat could be, but it is accurate -- everything that gets returned will be Numeric. Better documented than omitting at least, IMHO. In appropriate cases, a subset may be warranted for documentation, even if not in the implementation. Can we agree at least the simple cases should get documented with a -->? (I think most already are, and most changes have been adding them.) Curt
