>> The above is an unsubstantiated ... >> >> I see it differently. It shows that at least one user finds PDL slow >> and hard to use compared to other products... >> >> I think I recall hearing that at one point the CPAN install actually >> depended on OpenGL.... > > ... I compiled PDL and use it without any X on my machine...
Thanks for the link, Leandro. I've posted a reply at http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=891888 if anyone is interested. While it is disappointing to hear negative statements about PDL (especially vague, undocumented ones :-), I think it points to exactly the problem that we have in growing the PDL community. We've made a lot of progress with Daniel's lead in making the documentation and use of PDL more approachable to new users but we still have a way to go. I think we can be proud of PDL-2.4.7 and I see the upcoming 2.4.8 release as another improvement. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
