Noel Torres wrote this message on Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 22:21 +0100:
> On 23/10/13 22:05, Douglas Otis wrote:
> [...]
>
> >This represents an unused feature that could greatly strengthen and
> >protect all forms of email. Abuse would drop significantly within a new
> >paradigm that safely permits the establishment of domain reputations,
> >while also enabling services to operate safely from any IP address and
> >from any provider. Not even Reverse DNS has less overhead when DNS
> >timeouts are considered.
>
> Domain reputations are also considered in my idea, but I'm starting to
> think I'm losing time and energy here, since I see only negativity.
>
> Do some of you want to read how do I think it should be implemented?
>
> Them, you can discuss with a basis and not just pre-concepts about other
> methods (STARTTLS/DKIM/whatever)
My question is what does your idea bring the isn't already covered by
some combination of STARTTLS/DKIM/SPF/etc? Assuming small modifications
are made, such as expanding SPF to include the FP of the sender's cert.
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
