Noel, Great, writing a draft will be helpful and appreciated. While the comments may have come across as negative, think of them as helpful to possibly improve your idea or to combine with other ideas as appropriate through brainstorming. What I see is interest in a discussion, that's positive.
Seeing the full idea may change minds or offer opportunities for you to assist with improvements to existing efforts. Kathleen (Reading way too much for the diversity work - LOL). Sent from my iPhone On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:39 PM, "Noel Torres" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23/10/13 22:35, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > [...] >> >> My question is what does your idea bring the isn't already covered by >> some combination of STARTTLS/DKIM/SPF/etc? Assuming small modifications >> are made, such as expanding SPF to include the FP of the sender's cert. > Mostly two things: > a) stopping some spam messages before they even are transmitted > b) not being a combination but an idea that naturally addresses both > wiretapping and spam > Also > c) not being DNS dependant > > I will follow a good advice from one list member and will write a > document with the idea. > > Thanks all > > Noel > er Envite > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
