On Oct 23, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 10/23/2013 2:34 PM, Noel Torres wrote:
>> On 23/10/13 19:18, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>> On 10/23/2013 2:13 PM, Noel Torres wrote:
>>>> I think it would be possible, and even easy for the developers, to
>>>> program an extension to SMTP in which servers use OpenPGP among them,
>>>> independently of any TLS/SSL usage.
>>>> 
>>>> Why: It helps stopping spam because the receiver server can trust the
>>>> identity of the sender, and it helps avoiding wiretapping.
>>> 
>>> Please explain it's superiority over DKIM and SPF and DMARC.
>>> 
>>> d/
>>> 
>> Hi Dave
>> 
>> In short, DKIM does not avoid wiretapping on itself, SPF does not,
>> either, nor DMARC.
> 
> You cited the benefit you are seeking as trusting who the 'sender' was.  
> That's an authentication/signature task, not a confidentiality/encryption 
> task.
> 
> d/
> 
> ps. the mere fact of authentication does not vet the trustworthiness of the 
> validated identity.

Dear Dave,

As you know, DKIM can not authenticate the sender.  DKIM authenticates some 
unseen domain signed a portion of the message.  DKIM does not confirm the 
signing domain intended to send the message to the recipient either.  Nor does 
DKIM ensure valid message structure where acceptance on the basis of trusted 
DKIM signatures can be hazardous, contrary to the process described in the DKIM 
deployment RFC.  In addition, because DKIM can not authenticate the sender, it 
can never abate email abuse either, nor was that ever described as a supported 
feature.

StartTLS is not affected by message structure and indicates the intended 
recipient as well as identifying an accountable sender. StartTLS offers a safe 
basis for trust, reputation, and acceptance.  DKIM in conjunction with DMARC 
has very limited applicability and only prevents From header field spoofing but 
even then allows click-able links to be injected into a spoofed Subject header 
field.

Regards,
Douglas Otis

ps. DKIM authentication does not vet the message nor the trustworthiness of the 
signing domain.  DKIM does not validate any identity either.


_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to