I believe the tools team has made a web-based issue tracker available to each WG. Are we going to keep perpass going long enough to justify using an issue tracker? On Nov 12, 2013 8:16 AM, "Andreas Kuckartz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stephen Farrell: > > Way back in the mists of September there was a thread [1] > > on this that seemed to have broad agreement that this was > > a useful and quite doable change to TLS but I don't think > > we currently have a clear owner to push it along in the > > TLS WG. If everyone thinks someone else will get around to > > doing this, it won't happen. > > > > Any takers? > > Does the IETF have an issue tracking system for such issues (besides > mailing lists) ? > > Cheers, > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
