On 12/04/2013 11:13 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > problem is *political* and should > receive a *political* response
I am not sure what "political" means. The attacks we have seen are exploiting vulnerabilities others had exploited before. Fixing security vulnerabilities in protocol specifications, in implementations, and in deployments is something we have done before. Do you guys expect that someone (pick your favourite person) would say "This is not good. You must not exploit security vulnerabilities in the future anymore." Then, the Internet would be more secure. I fail to see the story. Ciao Hannes PS: To me it sounds like pushing responsibilities around without a clear idea what that could mean.
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
