Where are these being discussed? It's a response to an IETF draft, ergo [email protected] is entirely appropriate. That Perens doesn't submit it as an internet-draft in response just suggests lack of political nous.
Way to go on the selective quoting - I see you ignore the DRM point. Sheesh, you can't even give a pointer to the refutations you apparently cite. Don't you have anything substantial to say yourself, other than snarky oneliners? Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ ________________________________________ From: Ted Lemon [[email protected]] Sent: 04 December 2013 22:42 To: Wood L Dr (Electronic Eng) Cc: [email protected]; IETF Discussion; perpass; [email protected] Subject: Re: Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 On Dec 4, 2013, at 5:05 PM, [email protected] wrote: > This is a political problem, not a technical problem. From a technical > perspective, caching static content matters. Trying to figure out problems > that aren't security problems matters. Mandating secure communications for > worldwide http is pretty much the same as mandating secure encrypted email > worldwide - large failure modes, resulting in an inability to communicate. > Which is why use of secure email is not widespread. I take it you haven't been reading the responses to Bruce's essay, or you would have seen that these points have already been discussed and refuted. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
