Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: >It seemed like more of a threat to me.
I can't imagine what I have to threaten with. No, it was not a threat. >The NSA is very aware of the work that I am doing and its purpose. And your description doesn't make it sound as if it's intended to be a hinder to NSA. We were discussing the proposal to make the task of mass surveillance more difficult for one or more nation's intelligence services. That is where I feel the risk (not threat) is. >We don't know what NSA 3.0 is going to be doing but it isn't going to have >anything like the intercept capabilities of the past Since you can now get an ASIC bitcoin miner that does 10 giga hashes per second for around $240, we might have to adjust our capabilities assessment on the assumption that espionage agencies have custom silicon that we've never heard of, and lots of it. I don't think we can say for sure that TLS is any hurdle to NSA's mass surveillance program at all. Thanks Bruce -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
