On 1/29/2014 5:55 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
One idea that came up in Vancouver and that we (meaning at least
me:-) haven't had a chance to progress was the idea of trying to
get a team of folks together to go do privacy reviews of existing
RFCs. Or perhaps slightly differently, reviews that explicitly
consider pervasive monitoring, which might be more constrained
and a bit easier.
...
Now that we're in the run up to the London IETF, if some of you
had time to try self-organise that kind of thing that'd be great.
Any takers for trying to organise that?
Doing reviews for attention to PM is really an experimental activity.
We don't have a track record of those specific types of reviews and I
believe we are some distance away from having a shared, usable model of
what to review for.
But we do need to develop it.
So I think what you are proposing actually ought to be its own
development project, with the goal of producing a document in the realm
of "Guidelines for doing Pervasive Monitoring Reviews of IETF
Specifications."
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
