On 01/31/2014 10:38 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:55:47PM +0000, > Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 33 lines which said: > >> privacy reviews of existing RFCs. > > Just to check that I understand you correctly: do you think that > Internet-Drafts like draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy are such > "privacy reviews of existing RFC"? If yes, are there other examples to > follow? If not, what is missing in it?
Yes that seems like a reasonable example to me. The other questions would be fine things for the putative group of worriers (better name needed!) to consider. Cheers S > > I miss a privacy review of IP, which would help to answer questions > like "is the IP address a personal identifier" or "is IPv6 better or > worse than IPv4 for privacy, taking into account CGN and things like > that" > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
