On 1/31/2014 2:50 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:50:52AM -0800,
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote
We don't have a track record of those specific types of reviews and
I believe we are some distance away from having a shared, usable
model of what to review for.
We don't start from zero, we have already RFC 6973 and its section 8
is a very good example of privacy/PM analysis of an existing protocol.
That's nice input for someone considering how to do a PM review, yes,
but my comment was about actual performance of PM reviews in the IETF.
Think of the example as being based on theory, and an actual review --
and all the group interaction that accompanies it -- as demonstrating
practice.
Of course, in theory there's no difference between theory and practice,
but...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
