Hi, Do you mean an instrument of self organization?
I'll help in any way I can to get this off the ground. avri Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message -------- From: Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Date:02/01/2014 12:15 (GMT-05:00) To: Avri Doria <[email protected]>,[email protected] Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Hiya On 02/01/2014 02:58 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am willing to be self-organized into a PM worrier's klatch. > and even to review drafts for PM But you don't want to be a non-self-organizer? :-) I'm still looking for one, at least between now and London. What happens later can be figured out there. I think it'd help for a more productive meeting if someone has time to think some about the options for doing these kinds of review for example. I've requested a room for Monday lunchtime for this anyway. There will not be a perfect time for such a session of course, but that's probably as good/bad as any earlier-week slot. S. > > I think one of the things the Worriers would need to accumulate over > time, though I am sure the basic list can be created already from > draft-farrell-perpass-attack, is a list of clues for practices and such > that might be something to be worried about. > > avri > > > On 29-Jan-14 08:55, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> >> Hiya, >> >> One idea that came up in Vancouver and that we (meaning at least >> me:-) haven't had a chance to progress was the idea of trying to >> get a team of folks together to go do privacy reviews of existing >> RFCs. Or perhaps slightly differently, reviews that explicitly >> consider pervasive monitoring, which might be more constrained >> and a bit easier. >> >> I think Christian H. commented at the mic that there is probably >> a *lot* of low hanging fruit out there, and I suspect he's quite >> right:-) >> >> Now that we're in the run up to the London IETF, if some of you >> had time to try self-organise that kind of thing that'd be great. >> Any takers for trying to organise that? >> >> Using this list to start with should be fine, if it results in >> loads of traffic we can spin up a new one, or move over to >> [email protected]. >> >> If there are folks willing to take this on and having a >> side-meeting in London helps, I can get you a room for that. >> >> Thanks, >> S. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> perpass mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >> >> > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
