Thanks for the link. I will use the information in my documentation too. Are there any other patches which should not miss in a peruser package?
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:10:12 +0200, Janno Sannik <[email protected]> wrote: > This is info for the dc2 patch (Thanks for Taavi for digging it up): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00351.html > So : use the dc2 patch! > > On 12.03.2009 11:43, Stefan Klingner wrote: >> Thanks a million. It is not worth to bundling everything together and >> making a combined version, but if you do not read the whole mail list >> archive, you will never know which features peruser offer. Next point is >> that admins like me are not able to know the order patches have to >> applied. >> So one goal should be to provide an overview of all available patches and >> how they should be applied. next step would be a 0.4 release with all the >> patches included. The documentation base of this project is not as good >> as >> it should be and so it is really hard for interested testers like me to >> integrate the patch in a testing or productive environment. >> >> Personally I will use the patch for my productive servers and I want to >> use >> it with all available features. But currently I do neighter really know >> which features peruser offer nor where I can find a suitable >> documentation. >> >> As allready mentioned I will create a documentation including test >> szenarios and configuration reference on my website and if nescessary, I >> will also create a new version of the patch for testers but I will only >> be >> able to put the things togehter, if the developers of peruser and the >> patches will help me. >> >> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:30:42 +0000, "[email protected]"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Attached is the pam_limits patch, it should apply after the dc2 patch... >>> >>> You need to create a pam config file for peruser, i have the following >>> in /etc/pam.d/peruser: >>> >>> session required pam_limits.so >>> >>> I couldn't find the original email, so i tried to quickly extract it >>> from the source tree i had laying around. >>> >>> Looking back through the mail archives it seems there were a few misc >>> patches posted by various people... Is it worth bundling everything >>> together and making a combined version for people to test more easily? >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Peruser mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser > -- web: http://www.mephisto23.com _______________________________________________ Peruser mailing list [email protected] http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
