A VM is supposed to be seperate from the host operating system. The
reason being it is supposed to be a test bed for OS's so yes the problem
should still be present.


On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:54 +0000, Edward Kerr wrote:
> Yes - Thanks to Steve and Timothy.
> 
> I never really considered a VM. Not quite sure why I did not!!  Mind you 
> my Linux box only has an 80Gb HD so not too much space!!
> 
> Tell me - I already have VM player on my separate Windows box.  If I set 
> up a VM of, say 8.10 on this VM would the printing problem have shown 
> up, or does the VM access the Windows printing subsystem in some way - I 
> suspect it does not?
> 
> Alternatively I could bite the bullet and set up Virtual box on my Linux 
> machine.  I assume this would be the same idea as DosBox?
> 
> 
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> Steve Harker wrote:
> > Another option would be to use DosBOX or even better (if you have the
> > bandwidth) would be to download vmware player that the appropriate vm image
> > (there are versions available for all distro's in all states) including
> > Alpha releases. I personally am tempted to get the new Fedora Alpha.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Timothy Rayner
> > Sent: 02 March 2009 10:35
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Peterboro] Peterboro Digest, Vol 251, Issue 5
> > 
> > Maybe a good strategy would be to do a test-install on a separate
> > drive/partition before upgrading. That way you could try out the latest
> > version whilst still having a working copy. Once the new one tests out OK
> > you could upgrade the main drive. This would have the following
> > advantages:
> > 1. You wouldn't lose the ability to print/etc. while trying to iron out any
> > bugs in the new version.
> > 2. You can keep the new version on a separate drive until you or someone
> > else has ironed out all the bugs.
> > 
> > If you always have 1 main install and 1 reserved for checking out upgrades
> > you can repeat this strategy for further versions.
> > 
> > Not that I've ever tried this out myself. I'm still building my Linux box.
> > Decided against dual boot at the present time.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Timothy
> > 
> > Timothy Rayner
> > Office Junior and Trainee Web Developer
> > Khi-Ro Limited
> > t. +44 (0)1733 405820
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> > Khi-Ro Limited
> > 14 Orton Enterprise Centre * Bakewell Road * Orton Southgate * Peterborough
> > PE2 6XU
> > Fax: 01733 394123 * Registered in England and Wales 3615372
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > [email protected]
> > Sent: 28 February 2009 12:00
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Peterboro Digest, Vol 251, Issue 5
> > 
> > Send Peterboro mailing list submissions to
> >     [email protected]
> > 
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >     https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >     [email protected]
> > 
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >     [email protected]
> > 
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> > "Re: Contents of Peterboro digest..."
> > 
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >    1. Re: Peterboro Digest, Vol 251, Issue 3 (Edward Kerr)
> >    2. Malcolm - re printing and a moan about Ubuntu 8.10 (Edward Kerr)
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peterboro mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Purify your water with professional water treatment. Click now!
> http://ads.lavabit.com/fc/BLSrjwryunydwtIglqBWeIDCzwOI26GAz9TPo5yNNChabFXHNv2BvmVeWDO/
> ____________________________________________________________________________________



_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to