Hi Mark
I am happy for the list to remain public.
Kind regards, Nigel

Sent from my iPad

> On 20 Sep 2022, at 15:57, Mark Rogers via Peterboro 
> <peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 17:10, Michele Mor via Peterboro
> <peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> I think that the mailing list should be left public, since we should
>> be open with our communications and discussions.
> 
> I personally think this is a good principle.
> 
> However I do think it matters how the list is used, and looking at
> recent - and not so recent - traffic, it tends to be closer to "pub
> chat" than anything which would - generally - benefit from being
> minuted for public consumption. (Personal opinion, not the "official"
> position of lugmaster).
> 
> A list like this is very different from the mailing list of a project
> where openness and searchability are far more important. Also, access
> to our list archives just requires joining the list, it's not exactly
> secret, it's just not exposed to Google etc.
> 
>> Obviously this would mean that before writing an email each
>> one of us will have to be cautious and think more than usual
>> about the content of the email.
> 
> That's fair, however by its nature it does mean that some things may
> simply not be sayable, and would be best left to social meets or
> discord. Which I think will tend to lead to the death of the mailing
> list and a less accessible LUG as a result. And also:
> 
>> Given that some emails in the past few weeks have been sent
>> without knowledge of their open status, [...]
> 
> I think this is inevitable - the list has been quiet for a long time
> and it's not surprising that nobody remembers anything they were
> informed of when they joined the list. The solution is a regular
> reminder to the list, but I'd be reluctant to do that (would we have
> wanted a weekly reminder through the past few years of silence?)
> 
>> maybe those can be removed/deleted and the list made public
>> again once that it's done?
> 
> It is possible for me to delete messages from the archive (not sure
> how but the functionality is there, I've just never used it). Anyone
> who has a message they'd like removed can contact me off-list and I'll
> work it out, whether or not the list archive remains private.
> 
> But as I said before, I'm not a dictator. It's not my choice to make,
> just mine to implement. And whichever way it ends won't be to
> everyone's preference, unfortunately.
> -- 
> Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0344 251 1450
> Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER
> 
> -- 
> Peterboro mailing list
> Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

-- 
Peterboro mailing list
Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to