On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Check the old email. Satish and Matt had specific concerns. > Matt's last email said """ Okay, it seems like I can do everything I want to do. I vote we push it and wait for the breakage. However, can we wait to push it until Apr 1? I have a conference scheduled which will heavily use petsc-dev. """ Satish's complaint had something to do with "hg pull -u" versus "hg pull; hg update" in 1.8.1 versus later versions, though it seems that the only difference there was in .hg/dirstate which seemed inconsequential. Is there still a blocking reason not to use subrepos? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120606/f4cb015f/attachment.html>
