On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> What if it is some great fundamental improvement to BuildSystem (like > removing 70% of the code and making the rest a million times better)? We in > petsc-dev don't benefit from that? That is freaking insane and stupid! Of > course we want all updates to BuildSystem otherwise there are essentially > two different repositories evolving over time with different things in each > one. That is freaking insane! Who designed this stupid subrepo shit? It is > completely garbage if what you say is true. It's really simple, you commit to petsc-dev after the cool stuff goes into BuildSystem. It's a small price to pay for being able to go back to a consistent state and not needing to remember to update BuildSystem. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120606/b597845e/attachment.html>
