On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> One of the concerns we discussed earlier is the additional > requirement: 'subrepo' usage should be same/similar to 'single repo' > usage. This clearly is not possible with (A). [we have to buy into the > sub-repo model and use it appropriately]. > > i.e be aware which commands work with subrepos by default - and which > ones need '-s' for subrepo > I think most users only need to pull and update which will do the right thing with subrepo. > - and then be aware that buildsystem you > pull is not the latest [only the latest commited to petsc-dev] etc. > This is the right model anyway. If a BuildSystem patch is required by petsc-dev, there should be a commit in the petsc-dev repo stating that. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120606/a6b358fd/attachment.html>
