On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> You are both right :) I don't care where we put them, but I want BCs > and fields. However, this is no problem. > Right now I do BCs and fields as PetscSections held inside the primary > section. If IS can do what PetscSection > can do, I can jsut use another IS for each one. > Convergence! > > I actually like it where it is. Stick with DMComplexVecGetClosure() > with no section argument, and then > the DM holds an IS++. > Cool, now the "normal" user doesn't even see the ++IS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121109/e5f6fa81/attachment.html>
