On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:42 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > You are both right :) I don't care where we put them, but I want BCs > and fields. However, this is no problem. > Right now I do BCs and fields as PetscSections held inside the primary > section. If IS can do what PetscSection > can do, I can jsut use another IS for each one. > > Convergence! > Write it up! :-) > > I actually like it where it is. Stick with DMComplexVecGetClosure() > with no section argument, and then > the DM holds an IS++. > > Cool, now the "normal" user doesn't even see the ++IS.
