On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:42 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: >> You are both right :) I don't care where we put them, but I want BCs >> and fields. However, this is no problem. >> Right now I do BCs and fields as PetscSections held inside the primary >> section. If IS can do what PetscSection >> can do, I can jsut use another IS for each one. >> >> Convergence! >> > > Write it up! :-)
In the manual section on Unstructured Grids :) Matt >> >> I actually like it where it is. Stick with DMComplexVecGetClosure() >> with no section argument, and then >> the DM holds an IS++. >> >> Cool, now the "normal" user doesn't even see the ++IS. > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
