On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > I don't mind removing it, although the Fortran people still have to use > something else. > > We can leave it as PETSC_NULL_XXXX in Fortran as it is now. We have no other option. Recall that Fortran users *must not* use PETSC_NULL under any circumstances. I think that if anything, replacing PETSC_NULL with NULL in C would make the necessity of PETSC_NULL_XXX more clear. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130206/f23d1b07/attachment-0001.html>
