On Feb 6, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > I don't mind removing it, although the Fortran people still have to use > > something else. > > We can leave it as PETSC_NULL_XXXX in Fortran as it is now. > > We have no other option. We could use NULL_XXXX but that would be horrible :-) > > Recall that Fortran users must not use PETSC_NULL under any circumstances. I > think that if anything, replacing PETSC_NULL with NULL in C would make the > necessity of PETSC_NULL_XXX more clear.
