On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > I don't mind removing it, although the Fortran people still have to > use something else. > > > > We can leave it as PETSC_NULL_XXXX in Fortran as it is now. > > > > We have no other option. > > We could use NULL_XXXX but that would be horrible :-) Maybe NULL_INT_PETSC and REAL_PETSC_NULL and SCALAR_NULL_PETSC, to be as inconsistent as possible while still preventing namespace collisions... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130206/11120221/attachment.html>
