Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, I am aware, and as I pointed out, I was checking the complex build,
You didn't mention "complex" in this thread, just something about C
typedefs which isn't true because you get warnings like this in C.
warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'PetscScalar *' (aka '_Complex
double *') to parameter of type 'PetscReal *' (aka 'double *')
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
ierr = VecNorm(Z,NORM_2,&dp);CHKERRQ(ierr); /* dp <- z'*z
= e'*A'*B'*B*A'*e' */
^~~
> but not the examples because it is so noisy.
Building a single executable for all the tests would make it trivial to
check that they all compile cleanly. Making the runs completely clean
brings back the difficulty of comparing output.
pgpqzupsdIPFm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
